Programme Thesis
The AI2050 Early Career Fellowship funds bold, multidisciplinary, and risky AI research that has the potential to be hugely beneficial to society by 2050. It exists to support early-career researchers tackling the 'Hard Problems in AI'—including technical capabilities, responsible deployment, and societal benefit—who might struggle to secure traditional funding.
Selection Criteria
- Boldness and ambition of the research idea (must address a 'Hard Problem' in AI)
- Multidisciplinary approach (e.g., combining AI with neuroscience, pharmacology, ethics, etc.)
- Potential for societal benefit (explicitly tied to the 2050 framing question)
- Track record of independent, risky, or hard-to-fund research (even if pre-PhD)
- Quality of the research proposal (clarity, feasibility, methodology)
- Letters of recommendation (strength of endorsers, especially from established researchers)
- Diversity of background and perspective (geographic, disciplinary, career stage)
- Alignment with AI2050's focus on safety, reliability, and human values
Past Winners / Cohort Profiles
The 2023 cohort includes 19 fellows from top institutions (e.g., Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, CMU, Imperial College London, IISc Bangalore) across disciplines like computer science, philosophy, economics, and earth sciences. Archetypes: tenure-track professors (e.g., Chelsea Finn, Emma Pierson), postdocs/early-career faculty (e.g., Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Danish Pruthi), and independent researchers (e.g., Dan Hendrycks, executive director of a non-profit). Named examples: Aditya Grover (UCLA), Amanda Coston (UC Berkeley), Dan Hendrycks (Center for AI Safety).
Ideal Candidate Fingerprint
A postdoctoral or early-career faculty member at a top research university, with a strong publication record in AI/ML and a clear, high-risk/high-reward project that bridges multiple disciplines (e.g., AI + neuroscience, climate, economics). The applicant should have a compelling narrative for how their work will ensure AI benefits society by 2050, and strong letters from established leaders in the field.
Recommended Framing
Eniola should frame his CCT model as a novel AI/ML-driven approach to solving the hard problem of AI safety and human values—specifically, preventing addiction by encoding reward-memory suppression. He should emphasize his independent, pre-PhD track record (sole-authored preprints, Bayesian MCMC validation, provisional patent) and his LMIC perspective (Nigeria) as a unique vantage point for ensuring AI benefits diverse populations. The key is to connect his work directly to the AI2050 question: 'What happened by 2050 that made AI hugely beneficial?'—his answer: AI-powered neuropharmacology that eliminates addiction.
Watch Out
No PhD or current enrollment in a graduate program (most past winners are postdocs or faculty). The fellowship is highly competitive and typically awards $300,000 over two years, but the page mentions $100,000 for Eniola's track—this may be a different tier or a misread. Eniola's lack of formal academic affiliation (independent researcher) may be a disadvantage unless he can secure strong letters from his endorsers (Berridge, Gershman, Daw, Mattar). The rolling deadline means he should apply as soon as possible to avoid being compared to later, stronger applicants.