Programme Thesis
This programme funds open-source, public-good projects that advance the Web3 ecosystem, including research, developer tooling, and community education. It exists to provide non-dilutive capital to early-stage builders, validate impactful contributions, and serve as a stepping stone to larger funding rounds.
Selection Criteria
- Open-source code and public goods (research papers, freely available tools) are heavily favored
- Demonstrated impact (especially for retroactive funding) or clear potential for ecosystem benefit
- Alignment with specific focus areas: core protocol research, developer tools, Layer 2 scaling, ZK cryptography, community education
- For Ethereum ESP: multi-phase review for large grants; streamlined process for small grants ($5K–$30K)
- For Optimism RPGF: impact evaluated by badge holders; projects with 6+ months of demonstrable impact outperform
- For Arbitrum: responding to published RFPs increases acceptance rates ~3x
- For Solana: existing mainnet deployments receive priority; grants skew smaller ($5K–$50K) but approve faster
- For Base: emphasis on onboarding non-crypto-native users and consumer-facing apps
Past Winners / Cohort Profiles
The page does not list specific past winners, but typical archetypes include: open-source developer tooling projects (e.g., libraries, SDKs), ZK cryptography implementations, Layer 2 scaling solutions, community education initiatives, and DePIN infrastructure. Top Optimism RPGF recipients have exceeded $1.5M in a single round.
Ideal Candidate Fingerprint
A builder or researcher with a track record of producing open-source, public-good outputs (code, papers, tools) that directly benefit a Web3 ecosystem. The ideal applicant has demonstrable impact over 6+ months, aligns with a specific foundation's focus areas, and can clearly delineate open vs. proprietary components.
Recommended Framing
Eniola should position his CCT model and open-source platforms (IMPRINT, TOPOLOGIX, GATE) as public goods for the Web3 ecosystem, emphasizing the Bayesian validation and pre-registered hypotheses. Highlighting endorsements from prominent neuroscientists and the potential for blockchain-based addiction-liability screening could resonate with foundation grant committees focused on impactful, open-source research.
Watch Out
Eniola is not yet enrolled in a PhD or MSc, which may be a disadvantage for academic grants (e.g., Ethereum Academic grants). His research is neuroscience/pharmacology, not directly Web3; he must clearly articulate how his work benefits blockchain ecosystems (e.g., decentralized science, on-chain health data). No prior Web3 or blockchain experience is mentioned.